For this assignment I have to: Week 8 Assignment: Build a substance-based PowerP

Technology

By Robert C.

Important - Read this before proceeding

These instructions reflect a task our writers previously completed for another student. Should you require assistance with the same assignment, please submit your homework details to our writers’ platform. This will ensure you receive an original paper, you can submit as your own. For further guidance, visit our ‘How It Works’ page.

For this assignment I have to:
Week 8 Assignment: Build a substance-based PowerPoint
presentation (with audio support using
PowerPoint, Kaltura, PodOmatic or other available audio/video software) of at
least 15 slides with an introduction, body and summary slides on a the concepts
listed below from Week 8 Reading (Baltzan – Chapter 9).
I will take care audio portion. Just provide the
presentation and transcript/audio notes
Baltzan Chapter 9 is attached. This is from the book – but of course you can use outside 
sources as well.
See Attached  – will show exactly what needs to be on the slide
Total Value
= 100%
Exemplary
100%
Accomplished
85%
Developing
75%
Points Available
CRITERION 1
Introduction
The introduction clearly states the main point(s) and
sub point(s) to preview the structure of the presentation.
The introduction states the main point(s) and sub
point(s), but partially previewed the structure of the
presentation.
The introduction partially states the
main point(s) and sub point(s), but partially  previewed
the structure of the presentation.
10
10 % VALUE FOR
CRITERION 1
CRITERION 2
Process of The Systems Development Life
Cycle (SDLC)
The response clearly and accurately addressed the
process with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the process with acceptable
wording.
The response partially addressed the process with
clarity and accuracy.
10
10% VALUE FOR
CRITERION 2
CRITERION 3
Traditional Software Development
Methodology: Waterfall
The response clearly and accurately addressed the
concept with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the concept with acceptable
wording.
The response partially addressed the concept with
clarity and accuracy.
10
10% VALUE FOR
CRITERION 3
CRITERION 4
Agile Software Development Methodologies
The response clearly and accurately addressed the
concept with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the concept with acceptable
wording.
The response partially addressed the concept with
clarity and accuracy.
10
10 % VALUE FOR
CRITERION 4
CRITERION 5
Managing Software Development Projects
The response clearly and accurately addressed the
activity with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the activity with acceptable
wording.
The response partially addressed the activity with
clarity and accuracy.
10
10 % VALUE FOR
CRITERION 5
CRITERION 6
Choosing Strategic Projects
The response clearly and accurately addressed the
activity with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the activity with acceptable
wording.
The response partially addressed the activity with
clarity and accuracy.
10
10 % VALUE FOR
CRITERION 6
CRITERION 7
Project Planning
The response clearly and accurately addressed the
activity with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the activity with acceptable
wording.
The response partially addressed the activity with
clarity and accuracy.
10
10 % VALUE FOR
CRITERION 7
CRITERION 8
Managing Projects
The response clearly and accurately addressed the
activity with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the activity with acceptable
wording.
The response partially addressed the activity with
clarity and accuracy.
10
10 % VALUE FOR
CRITERION 8
CRITERION 9
Outsourcing Projects
The response clearly and accurately addressed the
activity with the appropriate wording and depth.
The response addressed the activity with acceptable
wording.
The response partially addressed the activity with
clarity and accuracy.
10
10 % VALUE FOR
CRITERION 9
CRITERION 10
Summary
The summary clearly restated the main point(s) and sub
point(s) to conclude the presentation.
The summary restated the main point(s) and sub
point(s), but partially concluded the presentation.
The summary partially re-stated the
main point(s) and sub point(s) and partially concluded the
presentation.
10